Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Why the border bill will fail
Date: 02/06/24 12:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
Dope1: The bill will fail because this is what it essentially locks in as a matter of law. 5,000 illegals per day = 150,000 a month before any triggers take place.

Read the bill, buddy, not some nitwit's musings on Twitter (X):

"(B) MANDATORY ACTIVATION. — The Secretary shall activate the border emergency authority if

"(i) during a period of 7 consecutive calendar days, there is an average of 5,000 8 or more aliens who are encountered each day; or

"(ii) on any 1 calendar day, a combined total of 8,500 or more aliens are encountered.

(C) CALCULATION OF ACTIVATION.

"(i) IN GENERAL. — For purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B), the average for the applicable 7-day period shall be calculated using—

"the sum of "aa) the number of encounters that occur between the southwest land border ports of entry of the United States;

"(bb) the number of encounters that occur between the ports of entry along the southern coastal borders; and

"(cc) the number of inadmissible aliens encountered at a southwest land border port of entry as described in subsection (a)(2)(F)(iv); divided by 7 "(II) 7.

The trigger is encounters, not crossings. There are no 5,000 crossers per day, every day.

And there's this, too:

"(III) SUMMARY REMOVAL.—If an alien does not seek such a secondary review, or if the supervisory asylum officer finds that such alien is not eligible for such protection, the supervisory asylum officer shall order the alien summarily removed without further review.

Asylum officers can immediately remove ineligible individuals. IMMEDIATELY, no review.

This should be your dream come true.

No wonder the border patrol officers union loves this bill.

I mean, fercryinoutloud, this should be like Christmas for you guys.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community