Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: SCOTUS on AZ voting:
Date: 08/22/24 4:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
I'm not sure this is really a distinction with a difference...so you can be an illegal, roll into a voter registration agency and register, but only for federal elections?

No. If you're not a legal citizen, you're not allow to register for or vote in federal elections.

Arizona back in the day tried to add a requirement to the process of registering that you had to provide documentation proving your citizenship at the time of registration in order to register. The Courts struck that down. There exists a federal statute that outlines what documentation you have to provide in order to register to vote, and the Courts held that Arizona couldn't add to required documents. It was pre-empted by federal law.

So Arizona tried to work around that, by adopting dual classifications of registration. They argued that the federal statute only applied to federal elections, and that AZ was free to adopt more stringent documentary requirements for state-only elections. They have also adopted legislation that tried to use some legal legerdemain to get around the federal registration statute and prevent people who didn't independently get their citizenship checked from voting by mail or voting in the Presidential elections.

The dual state-only election citizenship test was permitted by the Court to go into effect pending the litigation. The rest was not.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community