Investor: I want freedom.
Shrewd investor: I have Shrewd'm!
- Anonymous Shrewd
- Manlobbi
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
No. of Recommendations: 4
No. of Recommendations: 1
As I understand it, two different judges almost simultaneously ruled that the Felon can't cut off SNAP. So I'm not sure "half benefits" is going to be good enough. I didn't read the rulings, so maybe there's a loophole? The article I read implied they simply ruled "you can't do that, period".
No. of Recommendations: 2
As I understand it, two different judges almost simultaneously ruled that the Felon can't cut off SNAP. So I'm not sure "half benefits" is going to be good enough. I didn't read the rulings, so maybe there's a loophole? The article I read implied they simply ruled "you can't do that, period". ~OPGLooks like the RI judge say he could...
"The decision came after a federal judge in Rhode Island ordered the USDA last week to either start providing full November benefits to recipients
or partial benefits if the agency opts to only draw on SNAP’s contingency fund."
https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/03/politics/november-s...
No. of Recommendations: 4
So, I guess this means Trump isn't really a king, since he can't starve kids.
Yet, Democrat Senators, who refuse to pass the C.R. to permit SNAP to continue, have the god given right to....starve kids! Why, instead of No More Kings, we have a whole bunch of Kings! Chuck Schumer and his buddies!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Yes it is.
Which is why so many need said assistance in the first place.
But good for the judge. Bad culture, partially created by Woke -- is no reason to starve innocent kids -- 53% of them come from a broken home to start with and huge percentages of them dont have much good going on anyways.
Those on the Right extoling "christian" this and that --they are defaming their own faith sometimes.
No. of Recommendations: 3
So, I guess this means Trump isn't really a king, since he can't starve kids.
He's got the sentiment down though, you have to give him credit for that. Starving little black and brown kids would be right in his corner, if he could pull it off. MAGA! He's got more sympathy for beef prices.
No. of Recommendations: 3
this means Trump isn't really a king, since he can't starve kids. ~MAGABOTNo, it means he's only partially king, since he will be partially starving kids...
"Trump administration will partially fund SNAP, but it could take months."
"Trump has committed to partially funding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program with a $4.65 billion payment,
but using emergency funds to pay for reduced SNAP benefits could take a few weeks to up to several months.
The disclosure comes after a federal judge in Rhode Island ordered Trump to use emergency funds to pay for SNAP."
https://www.allsides.com/news/2025-11-03-0800/publ...
No. of Recommendations: 3
this means Trump isn't really a king, since he can't starve kids. ~MAGABOTWell...
"Trump says U.S. won’t pay any SNAP benefits during shutdown, contradicting court filing."
"Trump said that the benefits, which help feed 42 million Americans, will resume only after Democrats in Congress agree to pass a stopgap funding bill that would reopen the government."
Let Them Eat Cake! All Hail The King!
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/04/snap-trump-food-sh...
No. of Recommendations: 4
Democratic Senators refuse to pass C.R., thus starving children!!!! Many Many Democratic Senators are KINGS!!!!
KINGS are just fine if they are Democrat pols.
Let them eat road apples!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Democratic Senators refuse to pass C.R., thus starving children!!!! Many Many Democratic Senators are KINGS!!!!
Horseshit
No. of Recommendations: 1
If they were Kings - they'd be in the majority because in Sheeple's America - "Kings" win -- democratic folks - not so much.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No. of Recommendations: 3
But, they are KINGS!!! Democrat party does NOT believe in "democracy." Majority does not rule--KINGS Rule! Even if a minority!!!
Democrat Senators, why do you want to STARVE our children????
