Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Who will fight for you?
Date: 10/29/24 3:33 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
We got the Abraham Accords. Seems like it worked out pretty well.

The US Government also got a treaty with the Lakota Sioux at Fort Larami, signed by Lakota “chiefs” who were not authorized by the Lakota to speak for all bands. Then the calvary enforced the terms of the treaty on all Lakota, most of whom said “Those fort Indians don’t speak for us”

George Armstrong Custer died for their sins.

Rule number 1 of any treaty:
The accepted representAtives of all parties must sign off on the terms of a treaty, unless your name is Douglas MacArthur and you’ve brought the legal representatives of the Japanese government to the deck of the USS Missouri to sign the terms of an unconditional surrender. But even then, MacArthur observed protocol by ensuring all legal representatives of the parties were ther.

The Abraham Accords was a meaningless piece of paper, good only for papering over the absence of the very people who were “the problem”.

And its worthlessness became glaringly evident three years later on October 7th, when Hamas impressed the message in an orgy of violence, “Hey, remember us?”

Intractable, maddening, the rocky shore upon which many a ship of diplomacy has foundered…… the Palestinian “problem” is the central problem, and no solution will be found by ignoring them.

Now, Bibi doesn't seem to be ignoring them. He seems to be liquidating them, but that sort of final solution, in addition to being monstrously ironic, is untenable. Bibi is losing friends and shedding allies faster than my dog can shake off the water from her bath.

He’s either going to have to kill them all or find a way to sit down at a table with them, and I don’t believe that choosing door#1 is the path to peace and prosperity for the people of Israel.

Of course, as long as this drags out, Bibi stays out of jail.

So there’s that…

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to wzambon here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community