Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of STEM | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search STEM
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of STEM | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 221 
Subject: no FTL comms
Date: 03/10/2023 1:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/quantum-en...

I didn't think of this. But I think the author is correct. And if it broke the entanglement, you could only use it once anyway. But breaking the entanglement negates what you were trying to do.

When you take that step ' forcing one member of an entangled pair of particles into a particular quantum state ' that action not only breaks the entanglement between the two particles, but it doesn't break the entanglement and determine what that particle's properties were; it breaks the entanglement and places it into a new state that doesn't care about which state (+1 or -1) would have been 'determined' from making a fair measurement.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds