Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Time to Go
Date: 08/31/23 8:55 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
One would normally think a family member would be lobbying in private to convince people in this condition to step down. That may be happening. But who else is whispering in their ear telling them "you're doing find, hang in there..." Lobbyists for insurance companies and coal companies (McConnell)? Lobbyists for financial or legal interests (Feinstein)?

Maybe. Even likely.

But what I was really pushing back on is the idea that the political parties are strong enough to materially affect their decisions, such that their remaining in office reflects on the parties. I just think that's wrong. Political parties today are weaker than they've ever been, as institutions. Part of that is due to technology, and part of that is due to deliberate choices we've made to cut down the role of party organizations and leaders in controlling who gets elected. They just don't have anywhere near the power they used to have. Certainly not enough power to force out a sitting Senator. Whether Feinstein or McConnell stay or go is really outside of their control. And I'm not even sure they ever had enough power to force a Senator to retire before their term was up.

To 1pg's question, states probably don't have the Constitutional authority to recall or otherwise replace a Senator:

everycrsreport.com: PDF document

The Senate could expel a member, by a 2/3 vote. But regardless of what their colleagues think of the mental condition of Feinstein or McConnell, I imagine both are regarded fondly by their colleagues on their side of the aisle. They're probably not willing to subject them to the humiliation of an expulsion vote.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community