Post #21293 by EchotaSheeple on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1)

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

There are exceptions:

1.)Potentially replacing Sotomayor.

2.)Potentially replacing Thomas.

3.)War

Other than that - if it remains Trump v Biden, the next President is not only a lame duck, but a lame duck presiding over a Tribalistic, Caste-forming nation that won't be able to get much done.

Therefore, whomever wins in 2024- - will lose in 2028. More and more people from the UK to the USA are not content. They don't realize it's crap culture combined with tech run amok so they sit back and blame the incumbents. Hence whomever LOSES in 2024 will win 2028 and *maybe* have a chance to govern because things like Social Security will require men of goodwill to reform and retain.

I sure hope names like Beshear or Warner stay the hell away from the dumpster fire that is 2024.

Let Beavis or Butthead win it, and move on.

Print the post

Post New

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.