Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: jerryab   😊 😞
Number: of 48642 
Subject: Federal database about most people in the US..
Date: 06/30/2025 9:41 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/30/tr...

Does it also include the wealthy? Or not...???
Print the post


Author: alan81 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48642 
Subject: Re: Federal database about most people in the US..
Date: 06/30/2025 10:14 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
In reading the article, the intention is verification of voting eligibility. As such, I suspect that "the wealthy" would be included since they probably want to vote...
Alan
Print the post


Author: ges   😊 😞
Number: of 48642 
Subject: Re: Federal database about most people in the US..
Date: 07/01/2025 9:03 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Trump officials create searchable national citizenship database

Homeland security and Doge merge immigration data with social security to create index it claims will stop voter fraud


Voter fraud is virtually non-existent. This is not about voter fraud. Bullshit.

In response, union members in Maryland have sued the office of personnel management, the treasury department and the education department for sharing personal information with Doge officials “who had no need to know the vast amount of sensitive personal information to which they were granted access”, according to their suit.

“Defendants admit that the [Social Security Administration] granted Doge personnel broad access to millions of Americans’ sensitive PII [personally identifiable information],” US district judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland wrote in a decision ordering a temporary block on the Social Security Administration sharing information with Doge.

“This intrusion into the personal affairs of millions of Americans – absent an adequate explanation for the need to do so – is not in the public interest.”

The database in question was created with little engagement of the public, something that is requisite for building these types of mass surveillance databases. The Privacy Act of 1974 requires federal agencies to notify the public if there are new ways they plan to use or collect Americans’ personal information. Legal experts have also questioned whether this sort of a centralized database sidesteps many of the privacy and security protections implemented within each agency.


You would think conservatives would see this as more government intrusion into citizens lives. But no, there no longer seem to be many real conservatives.


Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds