Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search BRK.A


Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Post New
Author: rnam 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 20399 
Subject: Damodaran on business profitability
Date: 02/16/26 7:51 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Most companies have trouble earning their costs of equity and capital, but if you look at the aggregated values, there are multiple sectors in the US (technology, consumer goods and communication services) that earn double digit excess returns, pointing again to larger companies within these sectors being able to set themselves apart from the rest.

there is not a single geography where more than 50% of firms earn more than their required returns, with Japan ranking highest in percentages and Canada and Australia the lowest. Here again, the aggregated values tell a different story, with US companies collectively delivering excess returns of 8.44% on equity and 1.81% on capital, suggesting again that large US companies carry the weight of value creation in the market.

it seems to me that over the last four decades, moats have crumbled, partly as a result of global competition and partly because of disruption (which upends businesses, turning good businesses to bad ones), and the business landscape has tilted more decisively to larger firms, as more and more businesses become winner(s)-take-all. It is in this context that I take a more jaundiced view of what AI will do for company profitability and value. I believe that, as a disruptor, it will cause downward pressure on margins at most firms, and increase the advantages that larger firms have in each business.

https://aswathdamodaran.substack.com/p/data-update...

I thought this was an excellent analysis backed up by comprehensive dataset on profitability of companies across the globe.
Print the post


Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 20399 
Subject: Re: Damodaran on business profitability
Date: 02/17/26 3:18 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
A lot of interesting stuff in there, thanks for posting the link. I particularly like that he posted some medians, not just averages.

One thing surprised me a bit. He has a section about the rising trend of net margins among the S&P 500,
"As you can see, net profit margins have climbed over the last two decades for US companies, with a number of stories competing for why..."

What I found interesting is that the four explanations he mentions do not emphasize two which a researcher at the Fed felt almost entirely explained the situation, at least in the stretch 2002-2022: lower tax rates and lower interest expenses. They posit that the residual may be attributable mainly to rising productivity and lowered costs via globalization/imports. Mr Damodaran mentions but largely dismisses interest rates as a factor under "macro changes", but does not really touch on tax at all.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-...

One of Mr Damodaran's four listed causes is a change in the mix of the industries within the index, which makes some sense (remembering that weights in this context should look at revenues and profits, not market caps). Quite aside from interest and tax, Meta naturally turns more of each dollar of revenue into profit than GM does. But it's hard to ignore the Fed figures on what a large contribution interest and tax have had. In the 20 years of their study, EBIT rose 3.6%/year but net profits rose 5.4%/year. Without that gap, after 20 years a normal year's net profits would be 29% lower. That's a lot of explanatory power.

Personally I would also add industry concentration due to falling antitrust enforcement. The great majority of US industries have had a large increase in the market share of the largest 1-4 firms, which tends to lead to successful rent seeking and moves in the direction of monopolistic profitability. Combine that observation with the implications of Figure 3 in the paper by Grullon/Larkin/Michaely, looking at public firms in the stretch 1972-2014. Dividing industries by quintile in terms of the change in the number of firms in the industry, ROA rose by about 1.3% on average among the quintile with the biggest drop in firm count, and fell by about -2.6% in the quintile of industries with the largest rise in firm count. Competition matters for profits, it seems.

Jim
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds