No. of Recommendations: 3
So, is your argument then circular? Since you deemed it a Russian Collusion Hoax - any discussion of it in a paper, etc., shows the paper, etc., to be a bad source, and therefore any quantification of contacts/meetings, no matter what source they get it from, is null and void? So it's all bad? Never happened? Is this your argument?
That's YOUR argument.
That's EXACTLY the flow you libs are setting up. You sit here and try to proclaim that certain media outlets are unreliable (because you don't like what they say). You then point to some "fact checker" (who also shares a liberal bias) who then dutifully applies their own confirmation bias to find fault with non-liberal sites.
That's not how life works. I merely point out that the stones you're throwing are from the porch of a very large and very brittle glass house.
