Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Another Win For President Trump
Date: 03/06/24 4:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Nazi flyers thrown in our driveways at night, death messages taped to our mailboxes; not terminology.

We're talking about two different things.

The people doing that are racist people. They are taking action to injure minorities based upon specific intentional animus towards those minorities. And honestly, that's not really a disputed point in our politics or culture. The folks throwing around racist flyers or making death threats against minorities are pretty widely acknowledged to be racist people.

But whether the country is racist - or whether particular broad scale institutions or organizations are themselves racist - is very much a point of contention. And that I think that the contentiousness is exacerbated by the fact that people are using the term "racist" to mean very different things. Which makes them - or allows them to - misconstrue what the other side is saying.

So while the person with the Nazi flyers is racist under virtually all definitions of racist, there's a lot less precision when someone makes a claim about something different than a person - like, whether the legacy preferences in college admissions is racist. There's no real agreement on what it would mean for that specific admissions policy to be racist or not, and no immediate shared understanding of how the term "racist" is being used between two people who might be arguing that it is, or is not, racist.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community