Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Mission accomplished
Date: 05/03/26 6:02 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Look at a longer time horizon. Big inventory build in November and December, as if big oil knew what was coming. Big oil may have been fearing things would go badly in Venezuela, in which case their inventory build would have been perfectly timed.

I mean, probably not. It's tempting to try to fit everything into a narrative around big splashy events, but that's not always what's going on. Global oil inventories had been growing and growing for quite a while. Global oil stocks hit four year highs in October, before there was any visible movement towards Venezuela - and everywhere, not just in the U.S.:

iea.org - Oil market report december

...plus Venezuela is a tiny little bit of the oil market. Oil prices didn't really move much around the Venezuela operation. So it's probably just that macro forces had been leading to a big build up of oil inventories over the latter half of 2025 generally - not some conspiratorial machinations by Big Oil.

As for current oil production, we're still producing more oil than we did last year - or ever apart from the late 2025 peaks. So we're still pumping a shirt-ton. There's been a slight - less than 1.5% - reduction in output since the war started - but overall, we're still pumping like gangbusters. The slight dip might just be noise, or a continuation of the reduction of production in response to the oil glut from earlier in the year.

Or it might be a response to market conditions. Now's probably not a time when we need a lot of physical oil here in the United States. Oil is needed in Europe and Asia, but not particularly here. Meanwhile, the U.S. is releasing many millions of barrels from the SPD in an effort to keep prices in check, which is a lot of extra oil physically here in the U.S. High prices will cause some short term demand destruction, everywhere - so you end up with less U.S. demand for oil. It will take some time for all the tanker routes and delivery systems to get rerouted, especially since some tankers are "locked in" inside the Persian Gulf for now. So it makes perfect sense that oil producers might shave a teeny-tiny bit off of production for the time being.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community