Post #22532 by Carpian on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

I'm suggesting you ponder why Obama has failed to endorse Kamala.

Do you really think Obama is not going to endorse the Democratic candidate against Trump? Do you really think he's wanting to kill her momentum that has most of the party behind her and record fund-raising?

Color me cynical, but I believe the endorsements are largely orchestrated for maximum effect. Obama is going last because he's probably still the heaviest hitter. She's been off to a great start without his endorsement. There may come a time later when she could use a boost, and he will provide it at a strategic time.

That's political strategy. Beats the heck out of "Find me 10,000 votes" or "Hang the Vice President".

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.