Post #15641 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Seems the SCOTUS didn't approve the law, but just didn't want to get into the administrative issues that are the purview of the lower courts?

Yes. The merits of the law were not at the SCOTUS. They were only debating whether there should be an administrative stay during the pendency of the Fifth Circuit's review of the preliminary injunction. These are debates over whether a preliminary ruling should go into effect during the pendency of the appeal of that preliminary ruling - not the merits of the underlying case.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.