Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48490 
Subject: Re: Abortion Rights?
Date: 04/08/2024 2:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Not explicitly, no. It was involved with the right to privacy (mostly 4th Amendment, as I recall). I read the argument and reasoning. I don't think it is as solid as the forced servitude argument (13th Amendment). But I did understand the argument.

The Constitution also does not confer equal rights to women. The ERA was never ratified (even though, just a few years ago, they finally got enough states). But it appears that they are interpreting that every place it says "man" it means "people" (of any gender, ethnicity, etc). So, in effect, the ERA is reality even if it never officially passed. But it's still not part of the Constitution.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds