Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21943 
Subject: Re: Lows and CAPE
Date: 04/13/25 12:32 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 25
Given events and market gyrations do you think we could see a drop to the long term CAPE average of 16-17PE this would suggest S&P at 3400-3600.

Well, I think anyone expecting valuations to return to pre-2000 norms is likely to be disappointed. It really is different this time, I believe, so it's mainly a question of HOW different.
I do my own smoothing of real earnings, very similar to CAPE, but a bit smoother. So, considering only the modern era:
If the valuation were the same level as the average since 1985, the S&P 500 would be at 3646 today, a drop of -37.8%
If the valuation were the same level as the average since 1990, the S&P 500 would be at 4040 today, a drop of -31.1%
If the valuation were the same level as the average since 1995, the S&P 500 would be at 4322 today, a drop of -26.3%
If the valuation were the same level as the average since 2000, the S&P 500 would be at 4230 today, a drop of -27.9%
If the valuation were the same level as the average since 2005, the S&P 500 would be at 4142 today, a drop of -29.3%


The big monkey wrench in the process is that US corporate net margins have really soared in the last 15 years or so, to previously unheard-of levels. As a result, even a chart of extremely smoothed real earnings has bent upwards, like the climate hockey stick graph. The figures above implicitly assume that the current point on the trend is itself sustainable and appropriately cyclically adjusted, which might not be the case. All those figures above may be too optimistic if net profit margins fall at all in the direction of historical norms.

There are some nice articles explaining how this is the almost unavoidable flip side of large government deficits (among other side effects). It kind of falls out of the macro equalities. So, is the US deficit ever going to fall to old (late 20th C) normal levels? If so, then so will US profit margins, broadly speaking. Meaning the trend of extra-fast earnings growth is going to end, perhaps go into reverse for a while.

Statistics be damned, sometimes it's much easy to predict one company than the broad market.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community