Post #15656 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Shrewd'm.com

A merry & shrewd investing community

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Please be responsible for your own actions and words, and avoid blaming others or making excuses for your behavior. If you make a mistake, apologize and take steps to correct it.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

But, aside from conflict of interest, I would think that is the only valid reason to remove a judge.

There are others. If she were showing up drunk, or naked, or engaging in other types of misconduct, you could ask for her to be removed. Or not performing her duties at all - if she just stopped showing up for work, or held motion calendar only once a quarter, she could be removed.

But you can't remove her from a case just because she's making legal rulings you think are wrong.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.