Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (92) |
Author: rando   😊 😞
Number: of 21939 
Subject: Re: Make Berkshire Compound Again!
Date: 06/02/26 12:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
I am surprised more attention hasn’t been focused on Alphabet earmarking a whopping $30 billion of the proceeds to cover the 2026 calendar year tax obligations associated with the vesting of employee equity awards.

I'm not sure there's anything to talk about here. The vesting of employee equity awards doesn't generate a tax obligation for Alphabet - it generates a tax obligation for its employees. What Alphabet is doing is handling that tax obligation for them.

So in the absence of this arrangement, Alphabet issues $X worth of shares to its vesting employees. Employees need to sell $X*marginal tax rate of those shares to cover their own taxes.

Now, Alphabet will issue $X*(1-tax rate) to its employees. The employees will receive the after-tax proceeds, so will owe no further tax, while Alphabet will pay the cash tax obligation on behalf of its employees.

So rather than issuing a larger pre-tax number of shares to its employees, Alphabet issues a smaller post-tax number of shares to employees ($X*(1-tax rate)) and issues the tax effect-driven number of shares ($X*tax rate) to public.

I don't see any economic difference between the two arrangements, or any reason to be bothered by it.

You can get this information on page 3 of the pdf here:
abc.xyz - Alphabet Announces Proposed Billion Equity Capital Raise to Expand AI Infrastructure and Compute
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to rando here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (92) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community