Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: BlueGrits   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Genius Pick For Trump's Defense Secretary
Date: 11/14/24 7:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Austin, Texas, will be the location for the headquarters of the new U.S. Army Futures Command, Army Secretary Mark T. Esper announced today at a Pentagon news conference.
defense.gov - Army chooses austin as site for futures command headquarters

There's a huge military presence right up I-35 with plenty of room to accommodate growth, very close proximity to Baylor University, just up the interstate from University of Texas and several other universities, and just down the interstate from all the DFW-area universities. Choice of multiple major airports in addition to the military facility itself. A long established Army base just primed for growth and an area which could easily absorb the population growth. So why did they pick Austin?

The central downtown Austin urban area already suffers from huge traffic infrastructure problems and an ongoing housing crisis. On top of that, the city went to a council system based on districts, where many of the districts include outlying areas with little/no loyalty to the city itself. [In TX, a city can annex - without approval of residents - any adjacent property it wishes. Newly annexed residents receive little benefits and higher tax bills, leading them to vote for council representatives who vote "NO" on downtown improvements they have no use for.]

You can thank folks like Cornyn & Cruz for making this happen -- and it'll keep happening as long as the Pentagon is (for all practical purposes) as a jobs program for powerful members of Congress.

If they want to tackle gov't waste and inefficiency, end this kind of nonsense. In addition, stop programs where (because of Congress) the military buys equipment it doesn't want or need.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to BlueGrits here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community