Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Thomas Crowing a bit too much?
Date: 04/16/23 5:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
landyPeePee: Corruption - is awesome and deserved.Ere's to Thomas.But moreso here's to the Pentagon-and the Liberal apathy.Trillions!

Today's headline: "Russians boasted that just 1% of fake social profiles are caught"


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, back in the Trumpenbenchplatz, it comes to light that Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk,
"was required to list all of his published work on a questionnaire submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, including 'books, articles, reports, letters to the editor, editorial pieces, or other published material you have written or edited' asked the <Texas Law Review> publication to remove his name from an " article he authored that argued "Obama had discounted religious physicians who 'cannot use their scalpels to make female what God created male' and 'cannot use their pens to prescribe or dispense abortifacient drugs designed to kill unborn children.'

But a few months after the piece arrived, an editor at the law journal who had been working with Kacsmaryk received an unusual email: Citing 'reasons I may discuss at a later date,' Kacsmaryk, who had originally been listed as the article's sole author, said he would be removing his name and replacing it with those of two colleagues at his legal group"


With such dishonorable freaks on the bench, there's good reason for people to disrespect the judiciary of the US.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to sano here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community