Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Control Panel: Market front-running the Fed agai
Date: 09/22/25 12:12 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
What happens if the US defaults?
That is my central question.


"Defaults again" might be better phrasing : ) The 1934 Liberty Bond default was massive.
Of course I've just broken a US law by saying that: 4th amendment: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." Well, I question it.

Since all the debt is issued in US dollars, a normal default as in many other countries--simply not paying the money back--is essentially off the table, since the money can always just be created. The US theoretically could default that way, but it would make no sense since a simple signature makes the problem completely go away.

Consequently the main categories of default for the future are "technical" defaults, like T-bills getting repaid a few days late again because of a debt ceiling showdown, or "repressive" defaults, as in retrospective changes to the terms so that existing holders are limited in some way. e.g., changes to the date that the bonds get redeemed, or restrictions are added which reduce their true value, such as restrictions on transfer. The timely example here is the recently mooted forced conversion of short term debt to infinite term debt for non-US public sector holders. (or other holders as well, nobody knows unless and until it happens)

At the start of this year I owned a lot of T-bills. But, not being American, I don't lend money to the US any more.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community