Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Biden's new EV rules
Date: 03/21/24 1:20 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Nobody is stopping you from buying a gas car. All major manufacturers will continue to produce them for years, probably decades, unless the market decides otherwise. You are in favor of the market, right?

But it's pretty clear that this regulation will change where the market is. There will be fewer gas cars, and they will be more expensive, than if the government handed acted.

I mean, that's the point, right? If the choices of manufacturers and consumers were going to land in a place where we had 60% EV's by 2032 (or whatever the percent is), then you wouldn't need a regulation. You only need the regulation in order to change the amounts and prices of the ICE vehicles that manufacturers offer, relative to the amount and prices of EV's.

I've seen a few statements by the Administration taking this line about the measure - and I don't entirely understand the messaging. They're trying to tell Greens that they're taking big consequential action that will materially help the climate....while simultaneously claiming that the regulation isn't going to affect anyone's options or choices. Those things can't both be true. You can't materially change what's going to be available on the market without materially changing what's going to be available on the market.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community