Post #17095 by Aussi on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Doesn't this seem insane on the face of it?

Whichever way the Court rules, the first step to ensure a sound democracy is to not vote in a person without the integrity that founding fathers assumed would be inherent in a presidential candidate. That should be the first question a voter should ask themselves, does the candidate have the integrity to lead the country.

Guard rails can be put in place to try to limit the damage if the voters make a mistake on answering the integrity question, but guard rails should not be the first line of defense.

Aussi

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.