Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: RAMc   😊 😞
Number: of 3956 
Subject: Re: profitability subsumes beta and value as a factor
Date: 04/11/2025 4:38 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
I know that most here have doubts that selecting equities by Machine Learning are in the same category as equating the S&P500 prediction to butter in Bangladesh production. But as a comparison to using the profitability equation which has a 10.2% advantage over the universe in the upper bin. My novice ML system still in the early development stage currently has backtests with a 17% CAGR advantage (20% over the last 5 years). It works with gradually declining returns by selecting 10, 25, 50 or even a 150 stocks with lower turnover than my old screens. The problem is that ML has turned out to be an order of magnitude more difficult than the academic papers or textbooks make it appear.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds