Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: rayvt 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 6131 
Subject: Why Investors Underperform and How Not To
Date: 06/25/25 10:59 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
Antonacci, of Optimal Momentum, just posted a new article which related to Mechanical Investing

Why Investors Underperform and How Not To
optimalmomentum.com - Why investors underperform and how not to

Some highlights:
Here are some systematic approaches that have over 100 years of academic validation and long-term, real-time success:
Absolute momentum (rate of change) – here, here, and here
Simple moving average crossovers – here
Exponential moving average trend – here
Channel breakouts – here and here
Charting patterns – here
Dow theory – here and here
Relative strength – here, here, here, and here
Seasonality – here
Mean reversion – here, here, and here

Each "here" is a link to a published paper or book.

Another benefit of systematic rules-based approaches is that they can keep you from being swayed by your emotions. Unfortunately, not everyone who uses such models strictly follows them.

Most investors do not ... react well when their portfolios are down 50% or more. So, they try to mitigate downside risk exposure
Investors using bonds and other alternatives sacrifice terminal wealth for a minor reduction in portfolio volatility.

This brings to mind the current "twice the Nasda100 CAGR with simple criteria" thread, with it's large CAGR and also very HUGE drawdowns.


Markets often show a loss of momentum before they drop sharply. Trend-based approaches can then exit before much harm is done.

In accordance with what various people have said, "tops are rounded and take many months before the plunge" & "true bear markets drop slowly at first, quick sharp drops are just volatility and recover quickly". As we saw in April.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to rayvt here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,115 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community