No. of Recommendations: 1
You have proof that Clinton was the one who took the satellite photo out of the SCIF? I would expect nearly all of the instances of classified information in her servers came from people sending it to her. But I'm open to being shown that's not the case.She was caught with raw satellite images on her server, the kinds of things that live in SCIFs:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-spy-satellite-se...After months of denials and delaying actions, Hillary Clinton has decided to turn over her private email server to the Department of Justice. As this controversy has grown since the spring, Clinton and her campaign operatives have repeatedly denied that she had placed classified information in her personal email while serving as secretary of state during President Obama's first term. ('I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received,' she said last month.) Her team also denied that she would ever hand over her server to investigators. Now both those assertions have been overturned.(I paste the above to get past the 'intent to hold on to' the information argument, as she clearly did)
So what did she have?
Worse, the information in question should have been classified up to the level of 'TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN,' according to the inspector general's report.Top secret - self explanatory
SI = Special intelligence, which is info derived from intercepted communications
TK = Talent Keyhole. The original bunch of spy satellites were designated "KH-(some number)" and were referred to as "Keyhole" (as in, looking through someone's keyhole). TK therefore refers to material gleaned from a satellite asset.
So. She had spy sat data on her server. There's no universe where SI data derived from a spy satellite isn't classified and there's really no universe where that information would be allowed outside a SCIF.
So who removed it? The cool thing about high levels of clearance is that the number of people with access to it is very small. Nobody on Herself's staff at State would have had such access.
But, wait! There's more!
Any personal items'computers, electronics'where federal investigators suspect the classified material wound up, wrongly, will be impounded and searched. If it has TOP SECRET//SI information on it, 'your' computer now belongs to the government, because it is considered classified.So her closet server, since it had all that info on it, was technically government property all along.
Oh, and I forgot to mention - she erased several emails from it. Isn't destroying evidence a crime? Because destroying government property sure is.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-de...In late 2014, the State Department asked Clinton and other former secretaries of state to hand over any work-related emails they may have.
By then, Clinton had already "deleted some [emails] over time as an ordinary user would," FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers at a July congressional hearing.
And she tasked her legal team to determine which of the roughly 60,000 emails still on her server were work-related.
"Clinton told the FBI that she directed her legal team to provide any work-related or arguably work-related emails to State; however she did not participate in the development of the specific process to be used or in discussions of the locations of where her emails might exist," the FBI concluded in its investigative summary of the case.And by the way. Her lawyers that were examining the server...did they have security clearances? Bet they didn't.
