Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: Operating earnings
Date: 02/24/24 1:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
However, beside insurance business and investment income, the operating earnings is actually down 8.4% due to problems in railroad, utility & energy. And those problems may not get better.

It has been going on for a while.
Eyeballing the rolling-year real after-tax earnings separately in rails and in utilities, I tried to estimate what the "old conservative" numbers might look like.
i.e., what would a conservative cyclical adjustment level look like if the current dip turns out to have been transient.

For rails I took the lowest rolling year real figure ending from 2019-Q2 to 2022-Q4.
For utilities I took the lowest rolling year real figure ending from 2020-Q4 to 2023-Q1. Shorter period because until recently there was a strong up-trend.
The total of those two, in end-2023 dollars, would come out to $9.667bn as the "old conservative normal". The current figure is $7.418bn, having slid each of the last 8 quarters, and accelerating recently.

If the 2023 earnings in each of those groups were as high as those old "recent worst" numbers, the 2023 net on those two would have been $2.25bn higher. If valued at a multiple of 15, each share would be worth $23400 more today.

It's not a small problem. And as you note, it's hard to say with confidence how transient it will be.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community