Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search RI


Personal Finance Topics / Retirement Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |
Author: ptheland   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Cori Bush loses
Date: 08/08/2024 11:39 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
You might want to read what posted a bit more closely, as well as what is in your link.

Here’s what snopes says:

In a news conference after the rally protesting the planned removal of a Confederate statue, Trump did say there were "very fine people on both sides," referring to the protesters and the counterprotesters.

In fairness, he said this at the same time.

He said in the same statement he wasn't talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who he said should be "condemned totally."<\i>

So he said exactly what I claimed he said.

In reality, one side was neo-nazis and white supremacists. So why say there were fine people on both sides in the first place? My opinion is that he just says what he thinks people want to hear. He’s morally adrift, with no actual morals at all.

So he will say something nice about anyone and everyone, just to garner favor with them.

In this case, he called white supremacists both “fine people” and something to be condemned. So which is it? You can argue both sides from a single statement - as we are doing here.

*That* is why I say he is morally adrift, and will do or say anything at any time about anyone.

—Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of RI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds