Post #13146 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

No.

Okay, then.

Again, without some sort of limiting factor, it would violate international law. It's illegal to expel refugees from your country if they meet the requirements of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (which criteria the U.S. immigration law tracks).

So add a clause that amnesty claims may only be processed at official ports of entry. Anyone claiming amnesty at Eagle Pass or a random hole in the fence is denied. Deal?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.