I know it happens. And I know that the Biden Admin and activists in general don't care as they clamor for the elimination of the means for private citizens to protect themselves.

Any thoughts on a five hour police response and the adequacy of protecting an unarmed citizenry?

I can tell you that at least I care that guns never be taken away for the protection of the home. I just differ on what guns you can have. But the people I talked to were all or nothing. They wanted fully automatic with barrel feed armor piercing ammo among other things. I tell them as long as you're allowed a choice of a hundred or so of each category of handgun, rifle, and shotgun the second isn't violated.

If he called, and said, "Someone broke in while I was here and took some stuff," as Albaby pointed out - might be low priority. I'm sure he said more than that, but let's listen to his calls and let the police respond.

Any comments on why the fellow didn't spend part of the 3k on a pistol? :) The articles didn't say he couldn't own a gun. So are we really talking about someone who imprudently let the wrong people know he had 3k in cash and they seemed to know he had no gun.

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.