Post #47842 by jerryab on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Ahh, Jerry. Your innocence is refreshing.

I'm not talking about getting an actual SSN in their name. I'm talking about obtaining a name/SSN combo that will pass E-verify. I guess I didn't make that part clear.

(chuckle><chuckle>

They can't get one. That is the point. They submit ANY SSN+name combination and it will fail.

To pass E-Verify, an existing SSN+name must match--AND it can NOT be in use by anyone else. It also can not be that of a dead person (SSA keeps those records). That is where your logic fails. The employer has eight days to get it right--or else. So the employer does NOTHING when the E-Verify system rejects the request. How does an employer keep people on the payroll? They ignore the law because the cost is too high to NOT do so--and they get rewarded for it with cheap, low-cost, disposable labor.

We have all seen the results when management faces going to jail. So, your claims are totally irrational.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.