Post #29422 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

And here are more games:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elect...

Nevada Supreme Court: count mailed ballots 3 days after Election Day even without postmark

Okay, board libs. Let's say this was Ohio or Texas, and the state apparatus is firmly under the control of a rabidly partisan Republican. A judge then rules, "No postmark, no date, count that ballot 3 days after the election!"

You folks would *not* be cool with that.

But the state’s Supreme Court upheld the August decision by District Court Judge James Russell, who refused to block the counting of ballots without postmarks because of the importance of counting all eligible votes. Russell also found Republicans wouldn’t be irreparably harmed by counting late-arriving ballots because few votes were at stake.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.