Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 2
If the opposition's candidate of choice didn't get ballot access or wasn't allowed to run... then the 2024 winner wouldn't be legitimate and we'd have to deny the election.
Geez. Senate. Congress. Courts. I.R.S. F.B.I.
All America's institutions are suspect......
Gotta polish the language up more.
But - maybe closer we get spread it around to insure the more 'deserved' future.....
No. of Recommendations: 5
If the opposition's candidate of choice didn't get ballot access or wasn't allowed to run... then the 2024 winner wouldn't be legitimate and we'd have to deny the election.
Would you say the same is true if Barack Obama tried to run for a third term? That the election wouldn't be legitimate because he wasn't allowed to run against Trump, in place of Joe Biden?
No. of Recommendations: 2
In the minds of the left, we have to keep candidates off the ballot Because Reasons. In other words, to save democracy we have to destroy it first.
(Never mind that "democracy" = the democrat wins).
No. of Recommendations: 9
Dope1: In the minds of the left, we have to keep candidates off the ballot Because Reasons.
As I pointed out before, the Colorado lawsuit was filed by four republican and two nonparty-affiliated Coloradans, not by democrats.
And the only one who's been trying to destroy democracy is Orange Jesus, the instigator, leader, and celebrator of the insurrection.
No. of Recommendations: 2
And…?
I suppose to you and the way your mind works, this factoid actually means something.
But to normal people, it doesn’t. It could have been a dozen or a hundred “Republicans”. They don’t get to claim they represent the voters of Colorado.
And yes, the front group that handled the lawsuit was one of you innocuously named but in actuality a liberal front group.
Nice try. Go download some actual logic when you
Get your next firmware update.
No. of Recommendations: 5
They don’t get to claim they represent the voters of Colorado.
And they aren't.
They're questioning whether Trump is Constitutionally qualified. That's not about representing voters, that's about the requirements imposed by the Constitution. Just as for 1poorkid, they could (and should) rule that she isn't qualified because she's only 27. That's not representing voters, and doesn't pretend to be. It's questioning meeting the qualification criteria, which in this case includes not engaging in (or providing aid to) insurrection against this country.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Dope1: In the minds of the left, we have to keep candidates off the ballot Because Reasons.
The case in Colorado was filed by Republicans, minds of the right.
Have a nice 'facts be damned' day.
No. of Recommendations: 0
And they aren't.
Of course they're aren't, and it's silly for the poster I to whom I replied to try to imply they are.
No. of Recommendations: 13
Dope: In the minds of the left, we have to keep candidates off the ballot Because Reasons.
It's an interesting exercise, but not likely to succeed. So we're dead set on beating you in the election. As much as you deny it, it is your party, your side, that attempted to pull a self coup (a very undemocratic process), in which you attempted to thwart the will of millions of voters. Illegal as hell. Convictions with people spending decades behind bars for you Fearless Leader.
Rather than admit what was attempted, you concoct Fed agent provocateurs, blame what little police were there, etc. You spent weeks to months telling us "something big was going to happen", then it happens, then you deny it happened. So we piece it together, and it's bad. You can't admit that you tried to illegally stop the peaceful transfer of power and install a dictator ( an authoritarian narcissist0. Yes, you tried to resolve you differences by treason.
No. of Recommendations: 1
So we're dead set on beating you in the election.
By any means necessary, amirite?
As much as you deny it, it is your party, your side, that attempted to pull a self coup (a very undemocratic process), in which you attempted to thwart the will of millions of voters.
That's the narrative you're trying to sell, but as usual you've overplayed your hand. There was no "insurrection". It was a protest that turned into a stupid riot. Shouting INSURRECTION and having your media parrots go on about doesn't make it true, no matter how much the left wishes it were.
Yes, you tried to resolve you differences by treason.
Yeah good luck painting with that broad of a brush. Meanwhile, polish up your social justice street cred by chanting "tolerance" out of one side of your mouth while accusing every Republican of being a traitor to the Republic.
I swear you people are doing your level best to get Trump elected.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Dope1: In the minds of the left, we have to keep candidates off the ballot Because Reasons.
As I pointed out before, the Colorado lawsuit was filed by four republican and two nonparty-affiliated Coloradans, not by democrats.
And the only one who's been trying to destroy democracy is Orange Jesus, the instigator, leader, and celebrator of the insurrection.
****
Institutions - losing faith of the people.
HAHA.
Now be honest - when you are done fake crying about the Bill of Rights - which parts of it do you want to gut?
No. of Recommendations: 2
Now be honest - when you are done fake crying about the Bill of Rights - which parts of it do you want to gut?
Let’s see.
After whacking the 2nd amendment, he’d ramp up the left’s campaign to deny right wingers the ability to speak out about the government (so he could punches on lists) and after that well, if they’re not guilty then they shouldn’t have a problem with being searched all the time, amirite? Who needs the 4th or the 5th amendment?
And that’s just for starters.
