Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: Democrat Bob Menendez Indicted
Date: 09/22/23 2:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
He needs to resign. Immediately. Full stop. Do not pass GO. Get Out.

The only thing more frustrating about this is that he SHOULD have been convicted roughly six years ago for very similar corrption charges. He was indicted in 2015 by the DOJ (during a Democratic administration, mind you) on charges of bribery, fraud and making false statements. It went to trial in 2017 but the judge declared a mis-trial after the jury was unable to reach a verdict on any of the charges. The DOJ at that time (during a Republican administration, mind you) declined to retry the case. As Wikipedia indicates, that is possibly due to the fact that another Supreme Court decision in 2016 made raised the bar substantially for prosecutors to prove charges of bribery of a public official. That case was McDonnell vs United States, involving one-time Virgina Governor Bob McDonnell. McDonnell (a Republican, mind you) was indicted, tried and convicted in 2015 on multiple accounts of taking gifts from a Virgina businessman but appealed to the Supreme Court which, in mid 2016, tossed his conviction UNANIMOUSLY, at which point the DOJ declined to re-try. Keep in mind, this is the same Supreme Court whose track record for integrity has been utterly destroyed with MULTIPLE cases of MULTIPLE justices enjoying hundreds of thousands of UNDISCLOSED dollars in gifts, luxury travel or indirect income from parties with obvious business before the court.



WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community