To use your words, the "riot" was a cover to stopping the electoral count, which may have resulted in Pence changing his mind, or in the election being thrown into the House. don't limit your view to just the "riot" as you seem to be doing.

Nope, sorry.
You're alleging a vast conspiracy that no evidence exists took place.

The historical evidence is there, nothing vast, but it was enough with different pieces and players in motion. How were the fake electoral slates set into motion? How did all the people converge on Jan 6 - and why was Jan 6 chosen? Was it just coincidence then that the electoral count was going on? Why were legal memos written to support substituting electoral slates if no one was thinking that? Why were some people carrying zip ties? How did people suddenly want to hang Mike Pence? What can Roger Stone be connected to? Why are Constitutional legal scholars risking their licenses and reputations?

We all know about the fake accusations/disinfo/lawsuits of election cheating. Trump pretty much played into the prediction that the mail in vote in Georgia would go blue and claimed it was cheating. Then he pressured Georgia to change the count. All of that, all the way back to pressuring Ukraine to say lies to help his election. It all gets considered, but there's no pattern or practice to it right?