Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48481 
Subject: Re: The true meaning of the "right to bear arms&q
Date: 07/18/2023 5:59 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Well, just because "the people's right to keep and bear arms" isn't being used in an artful way to refer only to "the right to form a militia" elsewhere doesn't mean that it didn't mean solely that in the 2A!

True....but not very persuasive. As a super high-level principle of statutory construction, words are typically given their ordinary meaning, unless there's a reason not to give them their ordinary meaning. Some terms are defined, some terms are inarguably used as terms of art ("ex post facto" or "letters of marque and reprisal") - but when a term isn't clearly being used in an artful way, the presumption is that such term just means what it means.

So if "keep and bear arms" had both a common usage meaning and a 'term of art' meaning back in the day, you would use the common usage meaning to construe the 2A, unless there was a very good basis for not doing so.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds