Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4581 
Subject: Re: Is China ahead of the US in autonomous cars?
Date: 10/03/26 10:14 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
I completely agree with albaby1's comments about Gemini. I admit to laziness in popping a question to the easiest AI at hand (my free time at Claude hadn't cycled yet). Gemini has the bad habit, in addition to albaby1's observations of losing its track of thought in a short period of time and expressing the same line of loquacious BS as a substitute for thought that I found so annoying in the past with ChatGPT (which either by design or by my ever more aggressive prompts), but which is now thankfully minimized. (I am looking for information, not a new friend).

What I should have done is, rather than immediately posting the (reasonable sounding) results from Gemini is to ask both Claud and ChatGPT what they thought as well and then integrated the answers.


Jeff, this certainly wasn't a criticism of you personally. I just thought it interesting how constrained Gemini is, and I had just posted on TMF about it.

However, I think it's worth keeping in mind that this general architecture appears to be common to all the free models. They all have a core set of training data about which they have a lot of knowledge, but anything recent just involves some web searches - and very limited web searches, far more than I think we'd all expect.

Claude's better than Gemini, but it's still pretty nerfed. The training data's current through June 2026. But if you ask it a question that needs more current information, it will still only do 3 to 8 web searches, look at snippets from ten results from each search, and only occasionally actually pull the full article/reference from any of those hits.

I hadn't used Claude yet today, so I ran your initial prompt through it, asked for an answer and the search metrics. It did only seven web searches, only 63 hits, and only looked at the snippets for all of them. It did not pull even a single complete article to look at. Better than Gemini, of course, but still only a very casual amount of actual research.

Obviously it's better to compare the returns from multiple models than to just look at one - but all of them are going to be working of a very small knowledge base for things involving current events or recent developments.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,571 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community