Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Trade deal with UK reached
Date: 05/08/25 11:21 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Again, this is a trade deal that was already in the works for years, not something that was prompted by the 'reciprocal' tariffs.

Indeed. MY explain why the Brits never lost their minds over “the US launching a trade war in 200 fronts” or something.

No one's seriously advocating that the U.S. economy is on the brink of "collapse" - though we do face a serious likelihood of recession. Don't confuse message-board hyperbole for the actual positions that people take.

Nah, people never engage in hyperbole on the internet!

The economic numbers have been questionable for years. Propping up GDP with government spending is the worst kind of economic sugar high one could conjure up yet that’s what’s been going on for a while.

As for Starmer, I would hardly be surprised if he did take advantage a bit of the sticky situation the Administration put themselves in.

Heh. The UK, thanks to their Green Everything policies, cannot make anything anymore. While still a big economy they have virtually no ability to make virgin steel. This deal will hopefully help revitalize a strategic need for a key partner.

Funny…I thought we never negotiated anything that helps anyone else…

That gave Starmer a lot of cards to play - he could help Trump with a political problem (of Trump's own creation),

It’s questionable if Trump ever had a “political problem”. There are no elections of consequence this year. Had he waited until next year to do this with the midterms looming there might have been one but after 1 month of tariffs…there’s not much there.

It's that we're negotiating those deals from a position of weakness,

Uh, huh. The world’s #1 economy may not be dealing from a position of its *maximal* strength levels but never deals from a *weak* position.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (44) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community