Post #1482 by commonone on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

On April 6, justice Alito, in the case of West Virginia vs B.P.J. said the high court should grant emergency relief because it should set aside the reasons why the criteria are not satisfied.

Yesterday in the Danco case, justice Alito said the majority was wrongly granting emergency relief in a case in which he was not convinced the criteria are satisfied.

Hhmmm.

He also ignored the issue of standing and tongue-lashed the three liberal women justices in his dissent.

Now tell me again that the current conservative supreme court is not corrupt.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.