Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Post New
Author: ges 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48486 
Subject: Republican budget bill(s)
Date: 02/22/2025 8:56 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
Winner, winner, chicken dinner (though not for poor people).

Just as the Senate was about to begin a two-bill process for enacting Republicans’ legislative agenda, Trump interrupted with a play call: He preferred the House’s approach of stuffing border, defense, energy, spending cuts, and tax cuts into “one big, beautiful bill.” Senate Republicans proceeded to work on their blueprint for two bills anyway, and for good reason: If (or when) the House’s one-bill approach collapses in another legislative horror scene, the GOP is going to need a quick backup plan. House Republicans have set themselves up for something that’s going to be miserable to achieve. Per their budget, they need to find $2 trillion in cuts to mandatory spending programs in order to realize their massive tax cuts, and they’re looking to take nearly half of that from Medicaid. As those who recall the failed 2017 attempt to slash Medicaid will remember, such a move could come at a steep political price, and it’s one that moderate members are already insisting they don’t want to pay. And you know what happens when moderate House Republicans show a little spine? No, really, that’s a question. What happens? We’ve never seen it.


Slate
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds