Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Bloomberg and the USSC
Date: 01/03/23 7:43 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
What if Financial Rules are Unconstitutional?

Is regulation as we know it unconstitutional?

It's not inconceivable that, sometime soon, the U.S. Supreme Court could reach such a conclusion, invalidating much of the vast administrative apparatus created to promote such public goods as clean air, workplace safety and financial stability.

The court is right to worry about America's dozens of regulatory agencies abusing their power or becoming an unaccountable fourth branch of government. But if that's the concern, there are much better, more prudent and less disruptive ways to proceed.

Much of the administrative state rests on a time-honored convention: As long as Congress provides some 'intelligible principle' to guide an agency, courts usually defer to its expertise in interpreting statutes and making rules.

This deference has allowed the ambitious application of some very broad mandates.

To promote public health, the Environmental Protection Agency imposes myriad emissions standards and extracts hundreds of millions of dollars in fines from violators. To protect investors, the Securities and Exchange Commission mandates extensive corporate disclosure, prosecutes financial fraud and much more.

Now, though, several members of the court ' led by Justice Neil Gorsuch ' are challenging this paradigm, arguing that the Constitution's authors never intended Congress to delegate so much authority.

ncnewsonline.com - Editorial by bloomberg opinion what if regulation is unconstitutional

[The link is to 'NewCastle News OnLine', because trying to access it at Bloomberg directly they demand a subscription, even though I buy the magazine. Go figure.]

'The administrative state' has long been a target for Conservatives, who just want that big fat government off their back. Given the experience with unregulated crypto you might assume they would re-think, but no. Their real targets are things like environmental regulations and workplace safety and oh, I don't know, freeeeedum, but with the current makeup of the USSC I can foresee a real attack against the administrative departments that make government work.

As if Congress could write laws to cover everything conceivable possibility in the outcomes of their efforts.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,453 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community