Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (93) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Biden/s Sttatement on the Pardon
Date: 12/02/24 6:57 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
He DIDN'T interfere with the work of the DOJ. If anything, he gave them permission to go ahead and investigate.

That's not the point.

In his pardon statement, and the subsequent explanations from the press secretary, Biden claimed that the prosecution of Hunter was infected by raw politics. He's claiming that the DoJ was affected by politics. That Hunter was prosecuted because of (presumably) Republican political pressure on the DoJ demanding that outcome.

But that's....a really bad thing to say about the DoJ. He's claiming that DoJ is not independent. That it responds to political pressures. That it is sufficiently pliable to political pressures that even when they come from the opposition party to the President, it is vulnerable. If the DoJ can't resist political pressures coming from the minority party, even as against one of the most politically connected people on the planet (the President's own son), how could it possibly be independent of the political pressures brought by the President's own party against the President's opponent?

IOW, if the DoJ could be steamrolled by Republican Congresscritters into wrongfully prosecuting Hunter, how could it possibly avoid being steamrolled by Democratic Congresscritters into prosecuting Trump? If the prosecutorial decision for Hunter couldn't be protected from Republican influence, how could anyone possibly believe that the prosecutorial decision for Trump was protected from Democratic influence?

That's why Biden should never, never have tried to pin the reason for the pardon on something wrong with DoJ. But he did. Because he didn't want his legacy to include using the power of the office for personal reasons, so he threw DoJ under the bus.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (93) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community