Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88930 
Subject: Re: Radical right dream come true
Date: 03/03/25 11:45 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
Trump Slashes Social Security Staff, Raising Service Concerns

What Happened: The Social Security Administration announced plans to cut 7,000 jobs—roughly 12% of its workforce—as part of the Trump purge. The cuts come as more Americans than ever rely on Social Security, with over 73 million beneficiaries.

Why It Matters: With the agency already at a 50-year staffing low, these cuts will devastate customer service, delaying benefits for retirees, disabled Americans, and survivors. Despite Trump’s promises not to touch Social Security, his regime is gutting the agency that ensures people receive their payments.


That's why following Musk's approach is such a huge gamble for the Administration.

The general thesis they're operating under when cutting popular agencies is that the government can provide the same functionality with far fewer workers - that the employee rolls of the federal agencies are indeed filled with a lot of waste and "fat" that can be cut without affecting services. It's little different than when cutting the agencies whose missions conservatives dislike altogether, like USAID or Dept. of Education - Trump risks very little political capital if those agencies are unable to perform their functions. But when looking at the defense agencies, national security, law enforcement, Social Security, veteran's affairs, and a host of other governmental functions, the stakes are higher. There, the cutters have to be right that they can lose workers without affecting performance. "Move fast and break things" works well if you don't care about the thing being broken, but it will bite hard if it pisses off the voters in your base.

It will be fascinating to see what happens - which is why, I think, Trump's approval rating has stayed pretty constant despite the rapid upheaval in the federal government. He's getting the benefit of the doubt from his supporters, who are willing to give him (and Musk) a chance to prove what they're claiming. Their gamble is that they can make all these personnel cuts and either: i) everything still works okay; or ii) when things do break down, they can fix it by staffing up again.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy