Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: ges 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: The Mob Boss in Chief
Date: 03/23/25 9:45 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Paul, Weiss
What, The, Hell?

[Note to reader: The Surge spent 30 solemn minutes debating whether to extend the gag of a comma after each word throughout this paragraph—to show we mean business. Like Paul Weiss, we caved.] Last week, the Trump administration tried to shake down a third white-shoe law firm for having employed or represented people who investigated Trump. In this case, the firm was Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. The White House executive order, written in a high-tongue dialect of the Goonish language, called for suspending employees’ security clearances, limiting their access to government buildings, and putting a blanket ban on hiring them. As with a similar order against the firm Perkins Coie, it was probably illegal and unconstitutional eight ways from Sunday. But instead of fighting it in court, Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp visited the White House this week to surrender. According to Trump, the firm will “dedicate the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services over the course of President Trump’s term to support the Administration’s initiatives” and pledged not to “adopt, use, or pursue any DEI policies.” Per the New York Times, that DEI language was added by the White House after the two sides had agreed on wording. There were other discrepancies: The White House also said that Karp had “acknowledged the wrongdoing” of its former partner who investigated the Trump hush money case in New York, though HuffPost reported that Karp’s own memo to his staff included no such admission. At any rate, Trump rescinded his executive order. Surely Trump is done with these kinds of shakedowns now, right? Or do you think that such cowering could embolden him to pursue further muggings? Could go either way.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ges here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community