Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of FRTBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of FRTBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks F / Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (78) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: OT: what does an expanding universe mean?
Date: 03/26/24 6:36 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
I think the mathematicians are saying there are many more dimensions than just three or four. I don't recall now the number, but more than 7(??).

Your analogy of the balloon is our best picture of it yet, even if we can't visualize four dimensions (since we're only 3D creatures). You may have answered your own question, however. There is "nothing" outside the universe, so we may be expanding into nothing. The question presumes that there is "something" to expand into. I don't know that we know that. There may not be an "outside" of the universe.

Lawrence Krauss presented a reasonably good case that the universe came from nothing, and will go to nothing, because the net energy of the universe is zero. I'm not sure of the status of that hypothesis in the peer-reviewed community.

There is also the "frothy" multiverse hypothesis, where independent universes simply expand and grow, like the bubbles in a beer, totally unaware of the other universes. I don't know how we'd ever prove that hypothesis. I assume the mathematics work out at some level, or it never would have been suggested.

I was a physicist, but not a cosmologist. So I only know the bits and pieces from what I've read, and occasionally discussed with others. I did read Krauss' book, which I found pretty accessible (i.e. you don't need to be a physicist to read it). Though I don't recall him specifically dealing with what we may (or may not) be expanding "into".

Fun to think about this sort of thing sometimes.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 977 posts about Atheist Shrewds. The article-length ones it recommended most:
10 Commandments display blocked in Arkansas · 31 recs · 2026
At this time of Christmas · 26 recs · 2025
Huckabees, please · 14 recs · 2026
Welcome · 12 recs · 2024
Smart people · 11 recs · 2026
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (78) |


Announcements
Federal Realty Investment Trust FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of FRT | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community