Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Interesting take on the Israel - Palestine conflic
Date: 10/14/23 4:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Hamas will have successfully created thousands of new terrorists with their action. I don't think Israel's "retribution" is going to do what they think it is going to do. OTOH, Hamas does need to be eliminated based on their behavior, but doing so without injuring the innocent is difficult to impossible.

I'm not sure what you think Israel thinks their actions are going to do. They're well aware that their retribution will spawn many more new terrorists, and that there's no way to eliminate Hamas without injuring a lot of innocent people or creating thousands of new terrorists. They know full well that whatever they do, things will be worse than they were before the attacks. Even if (or especially if) they did nothing in response.

Again, there is no "good" outcome here. Only least-bad outcomes.

Israel's goal is to eliminate the experienced, entrenched, and well-organized terrorist organization. That has two beneficial consequences, even if there are loads of bad consequences. The first, it makes it clear that any future attacks that are able to achieve this level of atrocity will result in the destruction of the organization and people that perpetrate them. And second, you replace the experienced and well-organized terrorists with inexperienced new terrorists. Even if the latter are more numerous (at first), you'd rather have a bunch of newcomers to the fight than battle-hardened veterans.

The outcome will be terrible, and it will result in thousands of new terrorists - and it will still be better (in their estimation) than inaction or a token response.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community