Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |
Author: mechinv   😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: 50 million to 1
Date: 08/25/24 8:51 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
I absolutely loved giving 40% (marginal) to Feds and 11+% to California...

If you had some dollars taxed at 40%, you were making more than $470K per year (if married) while living in California. Congratulations, you're in the top 4% of earners in the US. You're also one those "coastal elites" that the MAGA people hate (insert smiley face here).

Can't wait for Democrats to feel entitled to even more of my money.

1) People in high-tax coastal states can make the argument that Trump felt he was entitled to more of their money. Thousands of people in NJ, CA, NY and CT paid thousands more in Trump taxes because Trump took away their ability to deduct their mortgage, property taxes and state taxes in full. I don't think the full SALT tax deduction is ever coming back.

2) The top tax bracket was 35% all through the George W Bush (Republican) years. In 2013, the Obama administration signed into law a new 39.6% bracket for any dollars earned above the $400K mark. But that new bracket was approved by and passed by the Republican majority-led house. So congressional Republicans in 2013 are also to blame for that new tax rate.

3) Trump's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was passed in 2017, and got rid of the 39.6% bracket. However, due to concerns that the lower rates could increase the budget deficit by $3 trillion over 10 years, there was an agreement back then that the new tax brackets would expire in 2025. Even Trump and Republicans understood at the time that getting rid of the highest tax bracket would be temporary.

Since MAGA people hate the "coastal elites", I'm actually curious if Republican "elites" mainly voted for Nikki Haley (who would have lowered their taxes) or if they voted for Trump and agree with the MAGAs that the "elites" are the problem :)
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mechinv here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community