Post #2485 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

"So that tiny probability is no justification to take fire arms away from law abiding"

I don't think most pf us want to take all fire arms away, in fact I think as long as a hundred or so each of rifles, handguns, or shotguns are available, the 2d is fulfilled. I'd rather keep semi-auto unless it becomes a big problem. so I agree with limiting the magazines to 10 shots each. I wouldn't think of someone not having an arm in the home. I haven't seen a problem with carry yet, but I'd prefer concealed so people don't get alarmed. I also simultaneously recommend changes in policing and neighborhood support.

I think the Bruen decision sets us back, and it will take time to deal with that. Time we don't have.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.