Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Post New
Author: commonone 🐝🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 55803 
Subject: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/14/2025 12:47 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 24
In the mid-1970s, if you were diagnosed with cancer in America, your five-year survival rate sat at 49 percent; today, it is 68 percent. Every $326 that the government invests in cancer research extends a human life by one year. And there are potentially transformative research projects happening all across the country right now, like cancer vaccines and a “flash” radiation treatment that lasts just a few tenths of a second and causes much less damage to the surrounding tissue.

New presidential administrations in the past have made every effort to make the transitions at the National Institutes of Health as seamless as possible.

Until this administration.

The Trump administration, in sharp contrast, has canceled hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of cancer-related research grants and contracts and suspended or delayed payments for hundreds of millions more — largely for political reasons.

It is also seeking to cut the N.C.I.’s budget by more than a third, and to sharply lower the percentage of overhead expenses that the government will cover for federally funded research labs.


Jonathan Mahler, writing in the New York Times, details how the Trumpedo administration is killing us and also writes a separate informative article on Rachael Sirianni, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, in Worcester, who focuses primarily on an aggressive form of pediatric brain cancer known as medulloblastoma.

No more. She is losing resources — both financial and personnel — and there is doubt now that her work will continue. And her work is irreplaceable.

Pediatric brain cancer, folks.

Hell, why fund work that can keep those kids from dying in excruciating pain when you can cut taxes for billionaires and redirect government dollars to your cronies, amirite?

Our extraordinarily successful scientific research system — one that took decades to build and has saved millions of lives while generating billions of dollars in profits for American companies and investors — is being dismantled before our eyes.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/magazine/trump-...

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/magazine/cancer...
Print the post


Author: g0177325 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/14/2025 1:50 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
Our extraordinarily successful scientific research system — one that took decades to build and has saved millions of lives while generating billions of dollars in profits for American companies and investors — is being dismantled before our eyes.

Because curing diseases and improving people's lives is clearly too "woke" a concept for MAGA to tolerate.
Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/14/2025 3:17 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
We're hurting younger folks. Appendix cancer is on the rise - used to be rare. We aren't very good at diagnosing it. We could have taken cancer treatment to the next level, which would've given them a boost. But now, we won''t invest in diagnosing it, so as it rises, they will live with it - or die.

We were getting ready to make huge strides in cancer treatment and... gone.
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/14/2025 5:32 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4

Hell, why fund work that can keep those kids from dying in excruciating pain when you can cut taxes for billionaires and redirect government dollars to your cronies, amirite?

Ayup. Let other countries pay for all the research. If a USian "JC" needs treatment, he can afford to fly to the other side of the world. It's the Proles, who don't have the resources, who will die young, "comforted by the fact their sacrifices made rich people richer"
/sarcasm

Steve
Print the post


Author: sano 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/15/2025 4:08 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
We were getting ready to make huge strides in cancer treatment and... gone.

We HAVE BEEN making great strides for decades.

Jackie Kennedy died from Non Hodgkins Lymphoma about 5 years after she was diagnosed. My wife was given a similar prognosis (5 to 7 yrs). Thanks to research programs and clinical trials at NCI facilities (like Fred Hutch, MD ANderson, UCSF, Stanford, UCLA) my wife's 5 yr prognosis was 22 years ago.

She does a vigorous 5 miler on the beach with her ladyfriends every morning.

What Trump has done, setting back healthcare and medical research programs, is unfathomable... and I think, I hope, he's catching on to what a stupid choice RFK Jr. was.
Print the post


Author: ebost   😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/15/2025 4:14 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
"...I think, I hope, he's catching on to what a stupid choice RFK Jr. was."
Not Likely.
Print the post


Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 2027 
Subject: Re: Trump is Dismantling Cancer Research
Date: 09/15/2025 4:19 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

We HAVE BEEN making great strides for decades.


True. But they were on their way to make cancer vaccines for individual genetic cancers and others. One ex-acquaintance was startled to find that the tonsil cancer I had was HPV Positive 16, an STD. I got a cancer from fellatio when I was younger. :) He didn't believe it. I pointed out that if you can get cancer from exposure to chemicals, why not an STD? Now they have vaxxes for the young kids - all of that kind of research - gone.
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds