Post #3927 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

But back to the point, the Rep party of today is not the party of Lincoln, and the Dem party of today isn't the party of Strom Thurman. They've both changed, and neither offers much diversity of thought today.

What's interesting is how much the core values of the democrat party have changed over the years:

https://www.racket.news/p/where-have-all-the-liber...
(From Matt Taibbi)

There can't possibly be controversy at this point as to whether or not this censorship program is going on. Whether it's the FBI forwarding the SBU asking for the removal of Aaron Maté, or the Global Engagement Center recommending action on the Canadian site GlobalResearch.Ca, or the White House demanding the takedown of figures like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the same types of behavior have now been captured over and over.

In light of this, I have to ask: where are the rest of the 'card-carrying' liberals from the seventies, eighties, and nineties ' people like me, who always reflexively opposed restrictions on speech?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.